Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754886AbbFWPhn (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Jun 2015 11:37:43 -0400 Received: from pandora.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:51455 "EHLO pandora.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754684AbbFWPhf (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Jun 2015 11:37:35 -0400 Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 16:37:24 +0100 From: Russell King - ARM Linux To: Daniel Lezcano , Thomas Gleixner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Guenter Roeck , Sudeep Holla Subject: "[-next] ARM: Fix build if CLKDEV_LOOKUP is not configured" Message-ID: <20150623153724.GA7557@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1115 Lines: 25 If you'd like me to apply a patch, it's no good discussing it in a place where I have no knowledge of, and then suggesting that I should apply it. Paul Gortmaker brought your patch to my attention, and said that it had been breaking MIPS for a week, and asked whether I had any knowledge of it. I did not. Given that the patch was created on 14th June, and it's now some 9 days later, I have to ask what's going on here? Has someone else queued it up? Is someone intending to apply it during the merge window once the stuff which causes the breakage in my tree has landed? Are you still expecting me to somehow pick up a patch that I had no knowledge of, for a breakage that I had no knowledge of? Basically, what are you expecting to happen with this patch? -- FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 10.5Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/