Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S933274AbbFWQNh (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 23 Jun 2015 12:13:37 -0400
Received: from smtp.citrix.com ([66.165.176.89]:21054 "EHLO SMTP.CITRIX.COM"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S932644AbbFWQNb (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 23 Jun 2015 12:13:31 -0400
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,666,1427760000"; 
   d="scan'208";a="274826700"
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 17:12:11 +0100
From: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
X-X-Sender: sstabellini@kaball.uk.xensource.com
To: Julien Grall <julien.grall@citrix.com>
CC: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
        Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>, <ian.campbell@citrix.com>,
        <tim@xen.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC 23/23] arm/xen: Add support for 64KB page
 granularity
In-Reply-To: <55897517.9000306@citrix.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1506231711250.18681@kaball.uk.xensource.com>
References: <1431622863-28575-1-git-send-email-julien.grall@citrix.com>
 <1431622863-28575-24-git-send-email-julien.grall@citrix.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.02.1506231508050.16917@kaball.uk.xensource.com>
 <55896F2D.5030405@citrix.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.02.1506231545370.18681@kaball.uk.xensource.com>
 <55897517.9000306@citrix.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-DLP: MIA2
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 925
Lines: 22

On Tue, 23 Jun 2015, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 23/06/15 15:49, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > Yes, you are right, I was reading an older version of Linux that still
> > had xen_remap_domain_mfn_range properly implemented.
> > 
> > The new function is called xen_remap_domain_mfn_array which calls
> > xen_xlate_remap_gfn_array.
> > 
> > I'll rephrase my question then: What about xen_remap_domain_mfn_array? I
> > guess we don't support that use case on 64K guests? If so, I would
> > appreaciate an assert and/or an error message.
> 
> See https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/5/14/563

Ah, that's fantastic! In that case:

Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/