Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933400AbbFWTJW (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Jun 2015 15:09:22 -0400 Received: from smtprelay0254.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.254]:34226 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932416AbbFWTJR (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Jun 2015 15:09:17 -0400 X-Session-Marker: 726F737465647440676F6F646D69732E6F7267 X-Spam-Summary: 2,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,rostedt@goodmis.org,:::::::::::::,RULES_HIT:41:355:379:541:599:800:960:973:988:989:1260:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1540:1593:1594:1711:1730:1747:1777:1792:2393:2553:2559:2562:2692:2693:2736:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3352:3622:3743:3865:3866:3867:3868:3870:3871:3872:3874:4250:5007:6119:6261:7875:7903:9707:10004:10400:10848:10967:11232:11658:11914:12296:12517:12519:12663:12740:13069:13161:13229:13311:13357:14096:14097:21080,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:fn,MSBL:0,DNSBL:none,Custom_rules:0:0:0 X-HE-Tag: brass56_50ca6f6d0d917 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2119 Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 15:09:14 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Cc: Gary Robertson , Jan Kiszka , LKML , linux-rt-users , Thomas Gleixner , Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH][RT][RFC] irq_work: Have non HARD_IRQ irq work just run from ticks Message-ID: <20150623150914.5ed3ee5d@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <5589A94F.9010209@linutronix.de> References: <20150622150959.44055b32@gandalf.local.home> <5589694D.4040504@siemens.com> <20150623123057.0bf8fc58@gandalf.local.home> <5589A94F.9010209@linutronix.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1125 Lines: 27 On Tue, 23 Jun 2015 20:45:35 +0200 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 06/23/2015 06:30 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > I'd be sleeping better at night with a third queue. I'll write up a > > patch and post that as an RFC as well. This will at a minimum keep with > > the paradigm of mainline linux. > > We had three queues. We are down to two and I think this is a good > thing. We only deal with FULL_NOHZ in hardirq context (looking at > v4.0-RT). Before that (FULL_NOHZ) everything was handled in softirq and > nobody was concerned (saw a problem). > > It would be good if we would address a regression or a bug or something > like that. The irq_work users may need to be audited. But I understand that it may not be a regression. I'm still worried that something will come along that will be affected by this with strange side effects. -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/