Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S267133AbTBDHFe>; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 02:05:34 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S267135AbTBDHFe>; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 02:05:34 -0500
Received: from franka.aracnet.com ([216.99.193.44]:38883 "EHLO
	franka.aracnet.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S267133AbTBDHFd>; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 02:05:33 -0500
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2003 23:13:31 -0800
From: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>
To: vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua
cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       lse-tech <lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: gcc 2.95 vs 3.21 performance
Message-ID: <162450000.1044342810@[10.10.2.4]>
In-Reply-To: <200302040656.h146uJs10531@Port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua>
References: <Pine.LNX.3.95.1030203182417.7651A-100000@chaos.analogic.com>
 <200302040656.h146uJs10531@Port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.2.1 (Linux/x86)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 682
Lines: 19

> I'm afraid it's code generation engine. It is just worse than
> M$ or Intel's one. It is not easily fixable,
> GCC folks have tremendous task at hand.
> 
> I wonder whether some big companies supposedly supporting 
> Linux (e.g. Intel) can help GCC team (for example by giving
> away some code and/or developer time).

Comparing Intel's compiler vs GCC on Linux would be more interesting.
Anyone got a copy and some time to burn?

M.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/