Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 06:25:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 06:25:47 -0500 Received: from pc2-cwma1-4-cust86.swan.cable.ntl.com ([213.105.254.86]:20883 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 06:25:46 -0500 Subject: Re: RFC: a code slush for 2.5? From: Alan Cox To: Gerhard Mack Cc: Jeff Garzik , lkml In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Message-Id: <1044361923.23312.28.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.1 (1.2.1-2) Date: 04 Feb 2003 12:32:04 +0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 816 Lines: 22 On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 18:18, Gerhard Mack wrote: > > So, if I had to make the proposal concrete, I would propose: > > "code slush" effective immediately > > code freeze, Easter holiday (April 19?) > > > > Comments/curses? > > It would be wise if a freeze was delayed until after at least IDE and > console switching both work reliably with preempt enabled. In which case April is unrealistic. Actually given the huge backlog from Linus holiday its pointless to even try and guess at things right now. We need to see what it looks like by about 2.5.63 to judge Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/