Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753619AbbFXTNB (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Jun 2015 15:13:01 -0400 Received: from mail.lang.hm ([64.81.33.126]:45330 "EHLO bifrost.lang.hm" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752620AbbFXTMz (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Jun 2015 15:12:55 -0400 Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 12:12:32 -0700 (PDT) From: David Lang X-X-Sender: dlang@asgard.lang.hm To: Martin Steigerwald cc: Ingo Molnar , Linus Torvalds , Andy Lutomirski , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , David Herrmann , Djalal Harouni , Greg KH , Havoc Pennington , "Eric W. Biederman" , One Thousand Gnomes , Tom Gundersen , Daniel Mack Subject: Re: kdbus: to merge or not to merge? In-Reply-To: <2038926.5NohgnpEa1@merkaba> Message-ID: References: <20150624131850.GA7346@gmail.com> <2038926.5NohgnpEa1@merkaba> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 805 Lines: 21 On Wed, 24 Jun 2015, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 24. Juni 2015, 10:39:52 schrieb David Lang: >> On Wed, 24 Jun 2015, Ingo Molnar wrote: >>> And the thing is, in hindsight, after such huge flamewars, years down >>> the line, almost never do I see the following question asked: 'what >>> were we thinking merging that crap??'. If any question arises it's >>> usually along the lines of: 'what was the big fuss about?'. So I think >>> by and large the process works. >> counterexamples, devfs, tux > > What was tux? in-kernel webserver David Lang -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/