Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 11:21:12 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 11:21:12 -0500 Received: from franka.aracnet.com ([216.99.193.44]:5836 "EHLO franka.aracnet.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 11:21:12 -0500 Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 08:27:28 -0800 From: "Martin J. Bligh" To: Adrian Bunk cc: linux-kernel , lse-tech Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] Re: gcc 2.95 vs 3.21 performance Message-ID: <177230000.1044376046@[10.10.2.4]> In-Reply-To: <173250000.1044373915@[10.10.2.4]> References: <200302040656.h146uJs10531@Port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua> <162450000.1044342810@[10.10.2.4]> <20030204122536.GV6915@fs.tum.de> <173250000.1044373915@[10.10.2.4]> X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.2.1 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 921 Lines: 24 >>> Comparing Intel's compiler vs GCC on Linux would be more interesting. >>> Anyone got a copy and some time to burn? >> >> There are already people who have done this, e.g. >> >> http://www.coyotegulch.com/reviews/intel_comp/intel_gcc_bench2.html >> >> compares g++ and Intel's C++ compiler with C++ code. > > C would be infinitely more interesting ;-) Speaking of which, has anyone ever compiled the ia32 Linux kernel with the Intel compiler? I thought I saw some patches floating around to make it compile the ia64 kernel .... that'd be an interesting test case ... might give us some ideas about what could be tweaked in GCC (or code rejiggled in the kernel). M. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/