Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 12:49:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 12:49:29 -0500 Received: from franka.aracnet.com ([216.99.193.44]:33423 "EHLO franka.aracnet.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 12:49:28 -0500 Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 09:55:41 -0800 From: "Martin J. Bligh" To: Patrick Mansfield cc: Adrian Bunk , linux-kernel , lse-tech Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] Re: gcc 2.95 vs 3.21 performance Message-ID: <186500000.1044381340@[10.10.2.4]> In-Reply-To: <20030204094041.A25052@beaverton.ibm.com> References: <200302040656.h146uJs10531@Port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua> <162450000.1044342810@[10.10.2.4]> <20030204122536.GV6915@fs.tum.de> <173250000.1044373915@[10.10.2.4]> <177230000.1044376046@[10.10.2.4]> <20030204094041.A25052@beaverton.ibm.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.2.1 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 775 Lines: 24 >> Speaking of which, has anyone ever compiled the ia32 Linux kernel with >> the Intel compiler? I thought I saw some patches floating around to make >> it compile the ia64 kernel .... that'd be an interesting test case ... >> might give us some ideas about what could be tweaked in GCC (or code >> rejiggled in the kernel). >> >> M. > > Martin - > > Like this? > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=103559880923586&w=2 Yeah, something very like that ;-) Thanks. Preferably less micro-benchmarky though .... M. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/