Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 14:41:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 14:41:22 -0500 Received: from noodles.codemonkey.org.uk ([213.152.47.19]:51356 "EHLO noodles.internal") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 14:40:18 -0500 Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 19:44:59 +0000 From: Dave Jones To: John Bradford Cc: "Timothy D. Witham" , vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua, root@chaos.analogic.com, mbligh@aracnet.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: gcc 2.95 vs 3.21 performance Message-ID: <20030204194459.GC6417@codemonkey.org.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , John Bradford , "Timothy D. Witham" , vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua, root@chaos.analogic.com, mbligh@aracnet.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net References: <1044385759.1861.46.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200302041935.h14JZ69G002675@darkstar.example.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200302041935.h14JZ69G002675@darkstar.example.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 608 Lines: 18 On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 07:35:06PM +0000, John Bradford wrote: > Maybe we should create a KGCC fork, optimise it for kernel > complilations, then try to get our changes merged back in to GCC > mainline at a later date. What exactly do you mean by "optimise for kernel compilations" ? Dave -- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/