Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751847AbbFYODj (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Jun 2015 10:03:39 -0400 Received: from mondschein.lichtvoll.de ([194.150.191.11]:60407 "EHLO mail.lichtvoll.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750786AbbFYODa convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Jun 2015 10:03:30 -0400 From: Martin Steigerwald To: "Theodore Ts'o" Cc: Linus Torvalds , Steven Rostedt , Andy Lutomirski , Richard Weinberger , Greg KH , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , David Herrmann , Djalal Harouni , Havoc Pennington , "Eric W. Biederman" , One Thousand Gnomes , Tom Gundersen , Daniel Mack Subject: Re: kdbus: to merge or not to merge? Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 16:03:27 +0200 Message-ID: <42241852.rlH1A4nH18@merkaba> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.1.0-tp520-btrfstrim-pstatetrace+; KDE/4.14.2; x86_64; git-e0fc73a; 2015-06-16) In-Reply-To: <20150625133456.GI14324@thunk.org> References: <5286070.NYrIjcpPS3@merkaba> <20150625133456.GI14324@thunk.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1663 Lines: 35 Am Donnerstag, 25. Juni 2015, 09:34:56 schrieb Theodore Ts'o: > On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 08:05:58AM +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > > Or, do you think, that there is a different option to handle this then > > the both I outlined above? > > Hmm... distros could have their engineers **fix** the busted userspace > code, instead of fixing the problem by jamming a different > implementation into the kernel? Hmm, I read on Devuan mailing list, that Qt engineers work on doing dbus directly inside Qt instead of using the existing libdbus. I did not verify this claim yet. But considering what I read here about performance issues with libdbus I think it would make quite some sense. Also I wonder who will use sdbus stuff from systemd / libsystemd – I sure hope sdbus will work without systemd running as PID 1, but I am not clear on this either – from the desktop environment people beside xdg-app. I doubt that Qt will depend on it, being available for more than the Linux platform. And if GNOME wants to be portable to the BSD variants at least, they can´t depend on it either. So who will use non portable sdbus anyway – except specialized apps? In case I missed this in the discussion so far, sorry, but from what I read from the various threads I am really not clear on this. -- Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/