Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 16:50:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 16:50:21 -0500 Received: from pc2-cwma1-4-cust86.swan.cable.ntl.com ([213.105.254.86]:16535 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 16:50:20 -0500 Subject: RE: PnP model From: Alan Cox To: "Grover, Andrew" Cc: John Bradford , ambx1@neo.rr.com, perex@perex.cz, Linux Kernel Mailing List , greg@kroah.com In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Message-Id: <1044399393.29825.17.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.1 (1.2.1-2) Date: 04 Feb 2003 22:56:34 +0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 698 Lines: 17 On Tue, 2003-02-04 at 19:53, Grover, Andrew wrote: > Ok fair enough. But I think the drivers should always think things are > handled in a PnP manner, even if they really aren't. ;-) For example, If this was a post 2.6 argument I would agree. The notion of removing all the horribly resource code and having ISA legacy drivers probe code do my_dev = isa_create_device(&resourceinfo, "soundblaster16"); my_dev->set_irq = foo; etc type stuff is nice - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/