Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 18:23:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 18:23:36 -0500 Received: from dp.samba.org ([66.70.73.150]:9893 "EHLO lists.samba.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 18:23:35 -0500 From: Rusty Russell To: Horst von Brand Cc: Kai Germaschewski , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, greg@kroah.com, jgarzik@pobox.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Module alias and device table support. In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 04 Feb 2003 09:05:46 BST." <200302040805.h1485lhI002898@eeyore.valparaiso.cl> Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 19:51:23 +1100 Message-Id: <20030204233310.AD6AF2C04E@lists.samba.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1014 Lines: 23 In message <200302040805.h1485lhI002898@eeyore.valparaiso.cl> you write: > > It's undefined for the "in the config file case" (they curently *do* > > override, but that's an implementation detail). It'd be clearer to > > explicitly say "you can't override module names with "alias", use > > "install" instead, IMHO. > > Urgh. What is "alias" then for? It has been used for ages as a way of "call > module foo by name bar, possibly with this further arguments". Why change > that gratuitously? I'm going to stop here, since I don't think you understand what I am proposing, nor how the current system works: this makes is extremely difficult to describe changes, and time consuming. Sorry, Rusty. -- Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/