Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 5 Feb 2003 03:08:12 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 5 Feb 2003 03:08:11 -0500 Received: from nat-pool-rdu.redhat.com ([66.187.233.200]:34262 "EHLO devserv.devel.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 5 Feb 2003 03:08:11 -0500 From: Alan Cox Message-Id: <200302050817.h158Hic14888@devserv.devel.redhat.com> Subject: Re: 2.4.21pre4-ac2 IDE status on PDC20268 To: szepe@pinerecords.com (Tomas Szepe) Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 03:17:44 -0500 (EST) Cc: alan@redhat.com (Alan Cox), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20030205063058.GA27959@louise.pinerecords.com> from "Tomas Szepe" at Feb 05, 2003 07:30:58 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 548 Lines: 12 > but misdetects the max transfer rate of the only drive on the > secondary channel and then won't allow me to set UDMA > 2 on it > (I get no error msg but there's no change). The 20268 code explicitly enforces that rule. I need to talk to Andre to find out exactly why. It is being done intentionally - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/