Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752987AbbFZW2W (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Jun 2015 18:28:22 -0400 Received: from pandora.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:58849 "EHLO pandora.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752489AbbFZW2L (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Jun 2015 18:28:11 -0400 Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 23:27:11 +0100 From: Russell King - ARM Linux To: Paul Osmialowski , Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Nicolas Pitre , Andrew Morton , Anson Huang , Ard Biesheuvel , Bhupesh Sharma , Daniel Lezcano , Frank Li , Geert Uytterhoeven , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Guenter Roeck , Haojian Zhuang , Ian Campbell , Jingchang Lu , Jiri Slaby , Kees Cook , Kumar Gala , Laurent Pinchart , Linus Walleij , Magnus Damm , Michael Turquette , Nathan Lynch , Maxime Coquelin stm32 , Olof Johansson , Paul Bolle , Rob Herring , Rob Herring , Sergey Senozhatsky , Shawn Guo , Simon Horman , Stefan Agner , Stephen Boyd , Thomas Gleixner , Uwe Kleine-Koenig , Catalin Marinas , Dave Martin , Mark Rutland , Pawel Moll , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, Yuri Tikhonov , Sergei Poselenov , Dmitry Cherkassov , Alexander Potashev Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] arm: add call to CPU idle quirks handler Message-ID: <20150626222710.GU7557@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1435094387-20146-1-git-send-email-pawelo@king.net.pl> <2139691.3OPR29uKdT@wuerfel> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 939 Lines: 20 On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 11:52:23PM +0200, Paul Osmialowski wrote: > I tried it and it works. This approach does not cause code duplication, but > (comparing to arm_pm_idle-based approach) its long. Would something like > this be accepted ever? > > Note that contrary to proc-v7, there's no __v7m_proc macro, I had to define > it in order to avoid another code duplication: And I don't like it - until we have word from Uwe, I'd like to keep this simple and restricted just to the affected SoC. Until we have it proven that this is a generic problem, we shouldn't go treating it as such. -- FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 10.5Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/