Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 5 Feb 2003 05:27:02 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 5 Feb 2003 05:27:02 -0500 Received: from ns.suse.de ([213.95.15.193]:61455 "EHLO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 5 Feb 2003 05:27:01 -0500 To: vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: gcc 2.95 vs 3.21 performance X-Yow: I Know A Joke From: Andreas Schwab Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2003 11:36:32 +0100 In-Reply-To: <200302050717.h157HTs16569@Port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua> (Denis Vlasenko's message of "Wed, 5 Feb 2003 09:15:48 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090014 (Oort Gnus v0.14) Emacs/21.3.50 (ia64-suse-linux) References: <200302042011.h14KBuG6002791@darkstar.example.net> <3E40264C.5050302@WirelessNetworksInc.com> <200302050717.h157HTs16569@Port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 728 Lines: 20 Denis Vlasenko writes: |> I am damn sure that if you compile with less sadistic alignment |> you will get smaller *and* faster kernel. So why don't you try it out? GCC offers everything you need for this experiment. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 N?rnberg Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different." - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/