Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751849AbbF0Us3 (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Jun 2015 16:48:29 -0400 Received: from mail-la0-f43.google.com ([209.85.215.43]:34069 "EHLO mail-la0-f43.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751773AbbF0UsW (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Jun 2015 16:48:22 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <558F09B3.9050907@gmail.com> References: <558EA370.6020108@gmail.com> <558EDCB2.9040603@gmail.com> <558F09B3.9050907@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2015 17:48:20 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: imx: apf27: the board no longer boot with latest git kernel From: Fabio Estevam To: Philippe Reynes Cc: Shawn Guo , Sascha Hauer , Russell King - ARM Linux , linux-kernel , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 885 Lines: 27 Hi Philippe, On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 5:38 PM, Philippe Reynes wrote: > I've tested this change, and it works fine. > In the file drivers/clocksource/timer-imx-gpt.c, there is : > #define imx21_gpt_irq_disable imx1_gpt_irq_disable > #define imx21_gpt_irq_enable imx1_gpt_irq_enable > So I think that using imx1 or imx21 has the same result; > > Do you think I should put both change in on patch ? > Or is it better to do two patches please ? I think they should be separate patches. Let's do the following: you sent the drivers/clocksource/timer-imx-gpt.c fix and I will send the dtsi change. Thanks, Fabio Estevam -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/