Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 5 Feb 2003 07:20:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 5 Feb 2003 07:20:46 -0500 Received: from nat-pool-rdu.redhat.com ([66.187.233.200]:60755 "EHLO devserv.devel.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 5 Feb 2003 07:20:46 -0500 From: Alan Cox Message-Id: <200302051230.h15CUHd04248@devserv.devel.redhat.com> Subject: Re: 2.4.21pre4-ac2 IDE status on PDC20268 To: szepe@pinerecords.com (Tomas Szepe) Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 07:30:17 -0500 (EST) Cc: alan@redhat.com (Alan Cox), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20030205102059.GG27959@louise.pinerecords.com> from "Tomas Szepe" at Feb 05, 2003 11:20:59 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 592 Lines: 14 > > The 20268 code explicitly enforces that rule. I need to talk to Andre > > to find out exactly why. It is being done intentionally > > Hmm, could you point me to the code in question? > I can't find it. Thanks. Hash collision, I was remembering something else. The 20268 should be setting up ATA66/100 unless the drive matches the blacklist - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/