Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753350AbbF2Jxj (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jun 2015 05:53:39 -0400 Received: from mail7.hitachi.co.jp ([133.145.228.42]:50924 "EHLO mail7.hitachi.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751464AbbF2Jxd (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jun 2015 05:53:33 -0400 X-AuditID: 85900ec0-9d7c9b9000001a57-32-55911585120c Message-ID: <55911599.3030607@hitachi.com> Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 18:53:29 +0900 From: Hidehiro Kawai User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120604 Thunderbird/13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dwalker@fifo99.com CC: Masami Hiramatsu , Ralf Baechle , linux-mips@linux-mips.org, david.daney@cavium.com, d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com, vgoyal@redhat.com, ebiederm@xmission.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: kexec crash kernel running with watchdog enabled References: <20150623140548.GA15591@fifo99.com> <558A53C0.5030700@hitachi.com> <20150624163141.GA20456@fifo99.com> <558CA488.4030400@hitachi.com> <20150626183302.GA26853@fifo99.com> In-Reply-To: <20150626183302.GA26853@fifo99.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 4729 Lines: 117 Hi, (2015/06/27 3:33), dwalker@fifo99.com wrote:> On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 10:02:00AM +0900, Hidehiro Kawai wrote: >> Hi, >> >> (2015/06/25 1:31), dwalker@fifo99.com wrote: >>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 03:52:48PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> On 2015/06/23 23:05, dwalker@fifo99.com wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> There was a commit in kernel/panic.c which altered when the kexec crash kernel is executed, >>>>> >>>>> commit f06e5153f4ae2e2f3b0300f0e260e40cb7fefd45 >>>>> Author: Masami Hiramatsu >>>>> Date: Fri Jun 6 14:37:07 2014 -0700 >>>>> >>>>> kernel/panic.c: add "crash_kexec_post_notifiers" option for kdump after panic_notifers >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> This made it possible for smp_send_stop() to be executed prior to calling the kexec crash >>>>> kernel. >>>>> >>>>> The issue is that smp_send_stop() offlines the cores, and other code depend on the cores being online. >>>>> >>>>> In my case on Octeon here's an example, >>>>> >>>>> panic() >>>>> crash_kexec() >>>>> machine_crash_shutdown() >>>>> octeon_generic_shutdown() >>>>> >>>>> Inside octeon_generic_shutdown() the Octeon watchdog is shutdown for_each_online_cpu(), but since >>>>> most of the cpu's already got offlined in smp_send_stop() it means the watchdog is still alive on >>>>> those cores. This results in a reboot during the crash kernel execution. >>>> >>>> Ah, I see. >>>> >>>>> Another example seem to be in default_machine_crash_shutdown() where crash_kexec_prepare_cpus() depends >>>>> on an IPI for saving the registers on different cores. However, the cpu's are all offlined with >>>>> interrupts disabled so they won't be running those IPI's in this case. >>>>> >>>>> I'm looking for any advice on how this should be fixed, or if it's already fixed. I'm not going to be >>>>> submitting a patch so if anyone wants to submit one feel free to do so. >>>> >>>> Hmm, IMHO, when the cpu goes to offline in appropriate way(smp_send_stop), it should stop >>>> watchdog timer on the offlined cpu too. >>>> Or, you can also register crash handler which stops all watchdogs, but it's a bit tricky. >>>> >>> >>> That doesn't really fix all the issue tho. As I was explaining generic MIPS code depends on the cpu's >>> effectively being online for crash data collection (with an IPI). This issue may effect other architectures also, >>> because smp_send_stop() offlines the cpu on other architectures also. I haven't surveyed the other architectures >>> enough to know what issue could happen from this tho. >>> >>> Is it possible to move the smp_send_stop() below the notifiers ? I'm just throwing out ideas. >> >> No, that doesn't works. Some notifiers assume that they run in >> single core mode. >> >> Another possible solution is to add notifiers just after >> machine_crash_shutdown() like this: >> >> void panic(const char *fmt, ...) >> ... >> - if (!crash_kexec_post_notifiers) >> - crash_kexec(NULL); >> + crash_kexec(NULL, buf); >> >> and >> >> -void crash_kexec(struct pt_regs *regs) >> +void crash_kexec(struct pt_regs *regs, char *msg) >> ... >> if (kexec_crash_image) { >> struct pt_regs fixed_regs; >> >> crash_setup_regs(&fixed_regs, regs); >> crash_save_vmcoreinfo(); >> machine_crash_shutdown(&fixed_regs); >> + if (crash_kexec_post_notifiers) { >> + kmsg_dump(KMSG_DUMP_PANIC); >> + atomic_notifier_call_chain(&panic_notifier_list, 0, msg); >> + } >> machine_kexec(kexec_crash_image); >> >> Most of archs stop other cores in machine_crash_shutdown(), >> so it will work well. Furthermore, it simplifies the special >> case where crash_kexec() is called without entering panic(). >> >> However, we need some tweaks for sh and s390 cases. As for sh, >> it seems not to stop other cores in the crash_kexec() sequence >> (kdump support is incompleted?). For s390, smp_send_stop() is >> called in machine_kexec() but not machine_crash_shutdown(). > > You could add an ifdef into the __setup() to filter out s390 and sh, until we figure out what > to do there. So the "crash_kexec_post_notifiers" wouldn't be available for those platforms. I agree on disabling the "crash_kexec_post_notifiers" feature for s390 and sh at this time. Also, we should make this feature effective only if CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP=y. Otherwise, it makes no sense. I'll prepare the bug fix patch. Please wait a moment. Regards, -- Hidehiro Kawai Hitachi, Ltd. Research & Development Group -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/