MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20150626192628.GA25806@kroah.com>
References: <20150626192628.GA25806@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 16:10:27 +0200
Message-ID: <CAFLxGvze1ya3BOPq+iyX5GVO_L9E9azHdX2eJURMu=PFJY0HRg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [!GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.2
From: Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@gmail.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
        One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
        Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Daniel Mack <daniel@zonque.org>,
        David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com>,
        Djalal Harouni <tixxdz@opendz.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 2008
Lines: 50

Greg,

On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 9:26 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Given the email threads about kdbus this week from various community
> members, I figured it would be good to let people know what was going on
> with things at the moment.
>
> We (David, Daniel, Djalal, and myself) do not need to rush anything and
> will be delaying the kdbus merge request for another cycle.  There still
> seems to be some disagreement and we are confident that with more time
> to review this can be sorted out.  We have asked distributions to start
> testing kdbus and have already gotten back valuable feedback from real
> world testing.  We are incorporating that feedback, fixing bugs, and
> optimizing some internal details which will all be part of the pull
> request for the next release cycle.

I've started digging into current kdbus to understand the changes you made and
have a question.
Where does all the development happen?

For example your current tree contains the following commit:

commit f3adf84302fb4fdb6698cf129b96546b47e27d33
Author: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu May 21 20:03:29 2015 +0200

    kdbus: skip mandatory items on negotiation

    The kdbus negotiation is used to figure out what items and flags an ioctl
    supports. It is highly impractical to pass in mandatory items when all we
    do is negotiation. Therefore, allow user-space to skip mandatory items if
    KDBUS_FLAG_NEGOTIATE is passed.

    Signed-off-by: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com>
    Acked-by: Daniel Mack <daniel@zonque.org>

Where was this patch posted to? Do you have mailinglist where one can follow the
discussions? As it carries an ACK there must be some review process.

-- 
Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/