Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 17:14:02 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@hofr.at>, oleg@redhat.com,
        paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mingo@redhat.com,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dave@stgolabs.net, riel@redhat.com,
        viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk, torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 05/13] percpu-rwsem: Optimize readers and reduce
 global impact
Message-ID: <20150629151402.GJ19282@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <20150622121623.291363374@infradead.org>
 <20150622122256.064223889@infradead.org>
 <20150623072811.GB20073@opentech.at>
 <20150625190800.GW19282@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <20150625191701.GA5013@mtj.duckdns.org>
 <20150629093219.GD3644@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <20150629151220.GL15805@mtj.duckdns.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20150629151220.GL15805@mtj.duckdns.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 855
Lines: 26

On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:12:20AM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Peter.
> 
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:32:19AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Agreed, luckily we already have the infrastructure for this, something
> > like so?
> > 
> > --- a/include/linux/percpu-defs.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/percpu-defs.h
> > @@ -287,6 +287,16 @@ do {									\
> >  	preempt_enable();						\
> >  } while (0)
> >  
> > +#define per_cpu_sum(var)						\
> > +({									\
> > +	typeof(var) __sum = 0;						\
> > +	int cpu;							\
> 
> Why not __cpu?

I've no idea, __cpu is indeed more consistent, consider it changed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/