Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753400AbbF2PsO (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jun 2015 11:48:14 -0400 Received: from a.ns.miles-group.at ([95.130.255.143]:65275 "EHLO radon.swed.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752968AbbF2Pr5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jun 2015 11:47:57 -0400 Message-ID: <559168A7.80206@nod.at> Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 17:47:51 +0200 From: Richard Weinberger User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Richard Weinberger CC: Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Arnd Bergmann , "Eric W. Biederman" , One Thousand Gnomes , Tom Gundersen , Jiri Kosina , Andy Lutomirski , LKML , Daniel Mack , David Herrmann , Djalal Harouni Subject: Re: [!GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.2 References: <20150626192628.GA25806@kroah.com> <20150629154523.GA6486@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: <20150629154523.GA6486@kroah.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2303 Lines: 55 Am 29.06.2015 um 17:45 schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman: > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 04:10:27PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote: >> Greg, >> >> On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 9:26 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman >> wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Given the email threads about kdbus this week from various community >>> members, I figured it would be good to let people know what was going on >>> with things at the moment. >>> >>> We (David, Daniel, Djalal, and myself) do not need to rush anything and >>> will be delaying the kdbus merge request for another cycle. There still >>> seems to be some disagreement and we are confident that with more time >>> to review this can be sorted out. We have asked distributions to start >>> testing kdbus and have already gotten back valuable feedback from real >>> world testing. We are incorporating that feedback, fixing bugs, and >>> optimizing some internal details which will all be part of the pull >>> request for the next release cycle. >> >> I've started digging into current kdbus to understand the changes you made and >> have a question. >> Where does all the development happen? >> >> For example your current tree contains the following commit: >> >> commit f3adf84302fb4fdb6698cf129b96546b47e27d33 >> Author: David Herrmann >> Date: Thu May 21 20:03:29 2015 +0200 >> >> kdbus: skip mandatory items on negotiation >> >> The kdbus negotiation is used to figure out what items and flags an ioctl >> supports. It is highly impractical to pass in mandatory items when all we >> do is negotiation. Therefore, allow user-space to skip mandatory items if >> KDBUS_FLAG_NEGOTIATE is passed. >> >> Signed-off-by: David Herrmann >> Acked-by: Daniel Mack >> >> Where was this patch posted to? > > There was a pull request that happened on the linux-kernel mailing list > with this patch in it, along with others. I saw the pull request on LKML but not the patch. That's why I'm asking. :) Thanks, //richard -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/