Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753225AbbF2WLf (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jun 2015 18:11:35 -0400 Received: from g9t5009.houston.hp.com ([15.240.92.67]:50816 "EHLO g9t5009.houston.hp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751336AbbF2WL1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jun 2015 18:11:27 -0400 Message-ID: <1435615884.21928.57.camel@j-VirtualBox> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] cputime: Make the reported utime+stime correspond to the actual runtime. From: Jason Low To: Fredrik =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Markstr=F6m?= Cc: Peter Zijlstra , mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rik van Riel , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric?= Weisbecker , jason.low2@hp.com Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 15:11:24 -0700 In-Reply-To: References: <1434099316-29749-1-git-send-email-fredrik.markstrom@gmail.com> <1434099316-29749-2-git-send-email-fredrik.markstrom@gmail.com> <1434104217.1495.74.camel@twins> <20150612110158.GA18673@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20150629145837.GE3644@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <1435604090.21928.19.camel@j-VirtualBox> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1459 Lines: 39 On Mon, 2015-06-29 at 21:08 +0200, Fredrik Markström wrote: > I don't think that is good enough. I believe the reason the > max()-stuff was initially put there to make sure the returned stime > and utime components are increasing monotonically. The scaling code > can cause either or to decrease from one call to the other even i > rtime increases. > > The purpose of my patch is to also make sure that the sum of utime and > stime is rtime. > > I lost the last part of the patch in my previous email: > > > - cputime_advance(&prev->stime, stime); > - cputime_advance(&prev->utime, utime); > + if (stime < prev->stime) { > + stime = prev->stime; > + utime = rtime - stime; > + } else if (utime < prev->utime) { > + utime = prev->utime; > + stime = rtime - utime; > + } > -out: > + if (prev->stime + prev->utime < rtime) { > + prev->stime = stime; > + prev->utime = utime; > + } > *ut = prev->utime; > *st = prev->stime; In this case, we might want to avoid the extra stime and utime computations if prev->stime + prev->utime >= rtime, since they wouldn't get used. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/