Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 5 Feb 2003 15:00:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 5 Feb 2003 14:59:41 -0500 Received: from packet.digeo.com ([12.110.80.53]:18075 "EHLO packet.digeo.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 5 Feb 2003 14:59:37 -0500 Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 12:09:03 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Andrea Arcangeli Cc: lm@bitmover.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.5 changeset 1.952.4.2 corrupt in fs/jfs/inode.c Message-Id: <20030205120903.1e84c12e.akpm@digeo.com> In-Reply-To: <20030205195151.GJ19678@dualathlon.random> References: <20030205174021.GE19678@dualathlon.random> <20030205102308.68899bc3.akpm@digeo.com> <20030205184535.GG19678@dualathlon.random> <20030205114353.6591f4c8.akpm@digeo.com> <20030205195151.GJ19678@dualathlon.random> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.9 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i586-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Feb 2003 20:09:07.0819 (UTC) FILETIME=[707F2BB0:01C2CD52] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 812 Lines: 18 Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > it might be simply an error in the tarball, maybe Linus's tree isn't in > full sync with bk head. But something definitely is corrupt between > tarball and bk. Well, the 2.5.59 BK tree shows that function using block_truncate_page() as well. The question is why did the Jan 9 changeset in the 2.5.55 timeframe not appear in the tree until post-2.5.59. Maybe on Jan 9 Linus only part-merged it by some means (making the web interface claim it is there), and this week completed the merge and updated the checkin comment? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/