Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753416AbbF3PwK (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Jun 2015 11:52:10 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f169.google.com ([209.85.212.169]:37070 "EHLO mail-wi0-f169.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750940AbbF3PwE (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Jun 2015 11:52:04 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1435607735-6332-2-git-send-email-kan.liang@intel.com> References: <1435607735-6332-1-git-send-email-kan.liang@intel.com> <1435607735-6332-2-git-send-email-kan.liang@intel.com> Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 08:52:02 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf,tools: check and re-organize evsel cpu maps From: Stephane Eranian To: "Liang, Kan" Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Jiri Olsa , "ak@linux.intel.com" , Namhyung Kim , Adrian Hunter , David Ahern , Peter Zijlstra , "mingo@redhat.com" , LKML Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 6663 Lines: 166 On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 12:55 PM, wrote: > > From: Kan Liang > > Some PMU events have cpumask, e.g uncore events. The cpu list set by > user may be incompatible with event's cpumask. > This patch will check the user defined cpu list. If the incompatible cpu > is found, it will warn the user and discard the incompatible cpu. Only > available cpu can be stored in evsel->cpus->map. If there is no cpu from > cpu list compatible with event's cpumask. It will error out. > > Here is an example. > According to cpumask, uncore should only available on CPU0 and CPU18. > So the S0-C1 for uncore should not count. > I don't think this is correct. The cpumask is a default set of CPUs to be used by perf. The cpumask does not indicate the ONLY CPUs on which to monitor. It is just a default. You can monitor an uncore event using a CPU not listed in the cpumask, unless the kernel code has changed recently. If you are not on the default CPUs, the kernel will IPI. > > Without this patch > $ sudo ./perf stat -e cycles,uncore_imc_0/cas_count_read/ -C0,1,18 > --per-core sleep 2 > > Performance counter stats for 'CPU(s) 0,1,18': > > S0-C0 1 6749638 cycles > S0-C0 1 0.83 MiB uncore_imc_0/cas_count_read/ > (100.00%) > S0-C1 1 232421 cycles > S0-C1 1 0.83 MiB uncore_imc_0/cas_count_read/ > S1-C0 1 236997 cycles > S1-C0 1 0.35 MiB uncore_imc_0/cas_count_read/ > > 2.001094019 seconds time elapsed > > With this patch > $ perf stat -e cycles,uncore_imc_0/cas_count_read/ -C0,1,18 --per-core > sleep 2 > event uncore_imc_0/cas_count_read/ can only be monitored on CPU 0 18. > Other CPUs will be discard. > > Performance counter stats for 'CPU(s) 0,1,18': > > S0-C0 1 5557406 cycles > S0-C0 1 0.21 MiB uncore_imc_0/cas_count_read/ > S0-C1 1 1012534 cycles > S0-C1 0 MiB uncore_imc_0/cas_count_read/ > S1-C0 1 916130 cycles > S1-C0 1 0.08 MiB uncore_imc_0/cas_count_read/ > > 2.001110843 seconds time elapsed > > Signed-off-by: Kan Liang > --- > tools/perf/util/evlist.c | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- > 1 file changed, 72 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evlist.c b/tools/perf/util/evlist.c > index 6cfdee6..f179379 100644 > --- a/tools/perf/util/evlist.c > +++ b/tools/perf/util/evlist.c > @@ -1101,6 +1101,71 @@ int perf_evlist__mmap(struct perf_evlist *evlist, unsigned int pages, > return perf_evlist__mmap_ex(evlist, pages, overwrite, 0, false); > } > > +static int cmp_ids(const void *a, const void *b) > +{ > + return *(int *)a - *(int *)b; > +} > + > +static int perf_evlist__check_evsel_cpus(struct perf_evlist *evlist, struct perf_evsel *evsel) > +{ > + const struct cpu_map *cpus = evlist->cpus; > + const int ncpus = cpu_map__nr(evlist->cpus); > + int j = 0, cpu_nr = 0, tmp = 0; > + int i; > + > + /* ensure we process id in increasing order */ > + qsort(evlist->cpus->map, evlist->cpus->nr, sizeof(int), cmp_ids); > + > + /* find the common cpus between evsel and evlist. */ > + for (i = 0; i < cpu_map__nr(evsel->cpus);) { > + > + if (j >= ncpus) { > + evsel->cpus->map[i++] = -1; > + continue; > + } > + for (; j < ncpus; j++) { > + if (cpus->map[j] < evsel->cpus->map[i]) > + continue; > + if (cpus->map[j] == evsel->cpus->map[i]) { > + cpu_nr++; > + j++; > + i++; > + } else > + evsel->cpus->map[i++] = -1; > + break; > + } > + } > + > + if (cpu_nr == 0) { > + pr_warning("event %s cannot be monitored on the given cpus." > + "Please check cpumask\n", evsel->name); > + return -1; > + } > + > + if (ncpus > cpu_nr) > + pr_warning("event %s can only be monitored on CPU", evsel->name); > + > + /* order evsel cpus */ > + for (i = 0; i < cpu_nr; i++) { > + if (evsel->cpus->map[i] == -1) { > + while (evsel->cpus->map[tmp] == -1) { > + tmp++; > + BUG_ON(tmp >= cpu_map__nr(evsel->cpus)); > + } > + evsel->cpus->map[i] = evsel->cpus->map[tmp]; > + evsel->cpus->map[tmp] = -1; > + } > + if (ncpus > cpu_nr) > + pr_warning(" %d", evsel->cpus->map[i]); > + tmp++; > + } > + evsel->cpus->nr = cpu_nr; > + if (ncpus > cpu_nr) > + pr_warning(". Other CPUs will be discard.\n"); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > static int perf_evlist__propagate_maps(struct perf_evlist *evlist, > struct target *target) > { > @@ -1108,13 +1173,15 @@ static int perf_evlist__propagate_maps(struct perf_evlist *evlist, > > evlist__for_each(evlist, evsel) { > /* > - * We already have cpus for evsel (via PMU sysfs) so > - * keep it, if there's no target cpu list defined. > + * We already have cpus for evsel (via PMU sysfs) > + * and target cpu list defined, check if they are > + * compatible. If not, discard incompatible cpus. > */ > - if (evsel->cpus && target->cpu_list) > - cpu_map__put(evsel->cpus); > + if (evsel->cpus && target->cpu_list && > + perf_evlist__check_evsel_cpus(evlist, evsel)) > + return -EINVAL; > > - if (!evsel->cpus || target->cpu_list) > + if (!evsel->cpus) > evsel->cpus = cpu_map__get(evlist->cpus); > > evsel->threads = thread_map__get(evlist->threads); > -- > 1.8.3.1 > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/