Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753419AbbGAICb (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Jul 2015 04:02:31 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-f44.google.com ([74.125.82.44]:33480 "EHLO mail-wg0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753363AbbGAICV (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Jul 2015 04:02:21 -0400 Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2015 09:02:16 +0100 From: Lee Jones To: "Opensource [Steve Twiss]" Cc: LINUXKERNEL , Samuel Ortiz , Alessandro Zummo , DEVICETREE , David Dajun Chen , Dmitry Torokhov , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , LINUXINPUT , LINUXWATCHDOG , Liam Girdwood , Mark Brown , Mark Rutland , Pawel Moll , RTCLINUX , Rob Herring , Support Opensource , Wim Van Sebroeck Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/4] mfd: da9062: DA9062 MFD core driver Message-ID: <20150701080216.GF3210@x1> References: <20150526161024.GQ11677@x1> <6ED8E3B22081A4459DAC7699F3695FB7014B22F4C4@SW-EX-MBX02.diasemi.com> <20150611085653.GG2982@x1> <6ED8E3B22081A4459DAC7699F3695FB7014B233463@SW-EX-MBX02.diasemi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <6ED8E3B22081A4459DAC7699F3695FB7014B233463@SW-EX-MBX02.diasemi.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1860 Lines: 50 On Mon, 29 Jun 2015, Opensource [Steve Twiss] wrote: > On 11 June 2015 09:57, Lee Jones wrote: > > > To: Opensource [Steve Twiss] > > Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/4] mfd: da9062: DA9062 MFD core driver > > > > > > > > Steve Twiss wrote: > > > > > > +#define DA9062AA_PAGE_SHIFT 0 > > > > > > +#define DA9062AA_PAGE_MASK (0x3f << 0) > > > > > > +#define DA9062AA_WRITE_MODE_SHIFT 6 > > > > > > +#define DA9062AA_WRITE_MODE_MASK (0x01 << 6) > > > > > > > > > > Lee Jones wrote: > > > > > For 1 << X, you should use BIT(X). > > > > > > > > Steve Twiss wrote: > > > > The whole of this file is automatically generated by our hardware designers > > > > I would prefer it if the register definitions and bit fields are not altered [...] > > [...] > > > Lee Jones wrote: > > To be honest, it's probably not a blocker for acceptance, but if someone > > writes a patch next week to change all of the (0x01 << X) lines to > > start using the BIT() macro, I will accept it. Better to influenced > > your guys so you are not overly inconvenienced. > > FWIW, when upstreaming code, the excuse "someone else wrote it", has > > never been a good one to use on the lists. Believe me, I've > > tried. ;) > > Hi Lee, > > Depending on your next step .. > I can either send a patch to this now or wait until you have reviewed the MFD > core: if there are any further comments on this, I can update the submission > retrospectively. Let's start over. Please re-submit the set. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/