Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S129164AbRBPKwy>; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 05:52:54 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S129175AbRBPKwe>; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 05:52:34 -0500
Received: from smtp9.xs4all.nl ([194.109.127.135]:58364 "EHLO smtp9.xs4all.nl")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S129164AbRBPKw3>;
	Fri, 16 Feb 2001 05:52:29 -0500
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 10:52:09 +0000
From: "Roeland Th. Jansen" <roel@grobbebol.xs4all.nl>
To: Rogier Wolff <R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl>
Cc: James Sutherland <jas88@cam.ac.uk>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 8139 full duplex?
Message-ID: <20010216105209.B11016@grobbebol.xs4all.nl>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.4.21.0102160930050.26108-100000@orange.csi.cam.ac.uk> <200102160940.KAA02620@cave.bitwizard.nl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.12i
In-Reply-To: <200102160940.KAA02620@cave.bitwizard.nl>; from R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl on Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 10:40:53AM +0100
X-OS: Linux grobbebol 2.4.1 
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 10:40:53AM +0100, Rogier Wolff wrote:
> Why would it completely "not work"? 


experience maybe. telnet works just fine. a copy would end in a _very_
slow transfer. and if I say slow, I mean a few kbytes/sec. depends on
the number of colls as well.

besides, what gains are expected with full duplex... aproximately none ?

-- 
Grobbebol's Home                   |  Don't give in to spammers.   -o)
http://www.xs4all.nl/~bengel       | Use your real e-mail address   /\
Linux 2.2.16 SMP 2x466MHz / 256 MB |        on Usenet.             _\_v  
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/