Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753498AbbGBCAE (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Jul 2015 22:00:04 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-f54.google.com ([74.125.82.54]:34379 "EHLO mail-wg0-f54.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753239AbbGBB76 (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Jul 2015 21:59:58 -0400 Message-ID: <1435802395.6887.20.camel@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 0/5] Expedited grace periods encouraging normal ones From: Mike Galbraith To: josh@joshtriplett.org Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Peter Zijlstra , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, tglx@linutronix.de, rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, dvhart@linux.intel.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com, bobby.prani@gmail.com Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2015 03:59:55 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20150702013426.GB19350@cloud> References: <20150630214805.GA7795@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20150630220014.GA10916@cloud> <20150630221224.GQ3717@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20150630234633.GA11450@cloud> <20150701100939.GR19282@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20150701105511.GN18673@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20150701140031.GB3717@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20150701141710.GG25159@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20150701161705.GK3717@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1435799484.3482.15.camel@gmail.com> <20150702013426.GB19350@cloud> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.11 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1695 Lines: 42 On Wed, 2015-07-01 at 18:34 -0700, josh@joshtriplett.org wrote: > On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 03:11:24AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > On Wed, 2015-07-01 at 09:17 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 04:17:10PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 07:00:31AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > > > > > > > That is a bit extreme, Peter. > > > > > > > > Of course; but I'm really not seeing people taking due care with them > > > > > > ;-) > > > > > > > > Are a huge pile of them coming in this merge window or something? > > > > > What raised your concerns on this issue? > > > > > > > > This is complete horse manure (breaking the nvidiot binary blob is a > > > > good thing): > > > > > > > > 74b51ee152b6 ("ACPI / osl: speedup grace period in acpi_os_map_cleanup") > > > > > > Really??? > > > > > > I am not concerned about this one. After all, one of the first things > > > that people do for OS-jitter-sensitive workloads is to get rid of > > > binary blobs. > > > > I know two users who have no choice but to use the nvidia driver with > > their realtime applications, as nouveau is not up to the task. > > Sounds like they have a relatively loose definition of "realtime", then. It would be better it they broke their beasts up into a bunch of small synchronized boxen, but they use big boxen here and now, with realtime rendering being a non-disposable portion of the load. -Mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/