Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753944AbbGBVAd (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Jul 2015 17:00:33 -0400 Received: from nautica.notk.org ([91.121.71.147]:44539 "EHLO nautica.notk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754273AbbGBVA0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Jul 2015 17:00:26 -0400 Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2015 23:00:09 +0200 From: Dominique Martinet To: Al Viro Cc: Jeff Layton , Andrey Ryabinin , Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [git pull] vfs part 2 Message-ID: <20150702210009.GC25177@nautica> References: <20150701085507.GE17109@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <5593CE37.4070307@samsung.com> <20150701184408.GF17109@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20150702032042.GA32613@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20150702080026.1c32f1c7@tlielax.poochiereds.net> <20150702080738.615e1c52@tlielax.poochiereds.net> <20150702164535.GM17109@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20150702130139.35e01106@tlielax.poochiereds.net> <20150702175629.GA25177@nautica> <20150702184314.GP17109@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150702184314.GP17109@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1484 Lines: 35 Al Viro wrote on Thu, Jul 02, 2015: > On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 07:56:29PM +0200, Dominique Martinet wrote: > > Using cache=none here so behavious is likely different with cache, but > > basically you can't get more than one tag per user thread accessing the > > 9P mount... > > Yes, and...? You can get a lot more than one user thread... Andrey is > using trinity(1) on client, and that's *definitely* not single-threaded - > the whole point is stressing the damn thing. I have run trinity quite a bit and it doesn't fork bomb as far as I can recall, with him running it with -C100 we're not quite at 2^16 yet? I do agree it's a problem, just don't think it's the one we're hitting -- I'll try again on a recent kernel to see if anything changed with rdma/tcp as well, but I'm starting to doubt I'll get any luck with anything other than virtio; which doesn't really help since it's not the same order of latencies. FWIW I don't *think* trinity can issue TFlush either without user interaction, that's a really special call. It can only happen in rpc() or zc_rpc() if it's interrupted by ERESTARTSYS which I understand as ^C? (I'll look into making the pools use IDA unless someone else steps up, sure. Thanks Jeff) -- Dominique -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/