Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754987AbbGCJXx (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Jul 2015 05:23:53 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:52359 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754161AbbGCJXc (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Jul 2015 05:23:32 -0400 Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2015 10:23:23 +0100 From: Will Deacon To: Alex =?iso-8859-1?Q?Benn=E9e?= Cc: "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu" , "christoffer.dall@linaro.org" , Marc Zyngier , "peter.maydell@linaro.org" , "agraf@suse.de" , "drjones@redhat.com" , "pbonzini@redhat.com" , "zhichao.huang@linaro.org" , "jan.kiszka@siemens.com" , "dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com" , "r65777@freescale.com" , "bp@suse.de" , Gleb Natapov , Jonathan Corbet , Catalin Marinas , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , "open list:DOCUMENTATION" , open list , "open list:ABI/API" Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 09/11] KVM: arm64: guest debug, HW assisted debug support Message-ID: <20150703092323.GA1588@arm.com> References: <1435775343-20034-1-git-send-email-alex.bennee@linaro.org> <1435775343-20034-10-git-send-email-alex.bennee@linaro.org> <20150702084847.GB3418@arm.com> <87pp4asm6u.fsf@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <87pp4asm6u.fsf@linaro.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1254 Lines: 38 Hi Alex, On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 02:50:33PM +0100, Alex Benn?e wrote: > Are you happy with this?: [...] > +/** > + * kvm_arch_dev_ioctl_check_extension > + * > + * We currently assume that the number of HW registers is uniform > + * across all CPUs (see cpuinfo_sanity_check). > + */ > int kvm_arch_dev_ioctl_check_extension(long ext) > { > int r; > @@ -64,6 +71,12 @@ int kvm_arch_dev_ioctl_check_extension(long ext) > case KVM_CAP_ARM_EL1_32BIT: > r = cpu_has_32bit_el1(); > break; > + case KVM_CAP_GUEST_DEBUG_HW_BPS: > + r = hw_breakpoint_slots(TYPE_INST); > + break; > + case KVM_CAP_GUEST_DEBUG_HW_WPS: > + r = hw_breakpoint_slots(TYPE_DATA); > + break; Whilst I much prefer this code, it actually adds an unwanted dependency on PERF_EVENTS that I didn't think about to start with. Sorry to keep messing you about -- I guess your original patch is the best thing after all. Will -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/