Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 12:31:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 12:31:06 -0500 Received: from abraham.CS.Berkeley.EDU ([128.32.37.170]:50184 "EHLO mx2.cypherpunks.ca") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 12:31:05 -0500 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Path: not-for-mail From: daw@mozart.cs.berkeley.edu (David Wagner) Newsgroups: isaac.lists.linux-kernel Subject: Re: [BK PATCH] LSM changes for 2.5.59 Date: 6 Feb 2003 17:16:39 GMT Organization: University of California, Berkeley Distribution: isaac Message-ID: References: <200302061502.KAA06538@moss-shockers.ncsc.mil> <20030206151820.A11019@infradead.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: mozart.cs.berkeley.edu X-Trace: abraham.cs.berkeley.edu 1044551799 22069 128.32.153.211 (6 Feb 2003 17:16:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news@abraham.cs.berkeley.edu NNTP-Posting-Date: 6 Feb 2003 17:16:39 GMT X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test74 (May 26, 2000) Originator: daw@mozart.cs.berkeley.edu (David Wagner) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 812 Lines: 10 Christoph Hellwig wrote: >Well, selinux is still far from a mergeable shape and even needed additional >patches to the LSM tree last time I checked. This think of submitting hooks >for code that obviously isn't even intende to be merged in mainline is what >I really dislike, and it's the root for many problems with LSM. You keep bringing up SELinux. Maybe you dislike SELinux; I don't know. In any case, LSM is not there just to support SELinux. It's intended to support a broad range of security modules and security policies. LSM is bigger than just SELinux. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/