Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755224AbbGCRYI (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Jul 2015 13:24:08 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-f54.google.com ([74.125.82.54]:36236 "EHLO mail-wg0-f54.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754673AbbGCRYE (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Jul 2015 13:24:04 -0400 Message-ID: <5596C521.1030005@linaro.org> Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2015 19:23:45 +0200 From: Eric Auger User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paolo Bonzini , eric.auger@st.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org, christoffer.dall@linaro.org, marc.zyngier@arm.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com, avi.kivity@gmail.com, mtosatti@redhat.com, feng.wu@intel.com, joro@8bytes.org, b.reynal@virtualopensystems.com CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, patches@linaro.org Subject: Re: [RFC 12/17] irq: bypass: Extend skeleton for ARM forwarding control References: <1435843047-6327-1-git-send-email-eric.auger@linaro.org> <1435843047-6327-13-git-send-email-eric.auger@linaro.org> <55953F5F.9090203@redhat.com> <55968A34.5010409@linaro.org> <5596C44F.8070903@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <5596C44F.8070903@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1182 Lines: 38 On 07/03/2015 07:20 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > On 03/07/2015 15:12, Eric Auger wrote: >>>> Linux IRQ and active should be okay. As to the vfio_device handle, you >>>> should link it from the vfio_platform_device instead. And for the >>>> vfio_platform_device, you can link it from the vfio_platform_irq instead. >> For this last one, I don't think this is achievable since if I store the >> vfio_platform_irq in the opaque, it matches irqs[i] of >> vfio_platform_device and I don't have any mean to retrieve "i" when >> calling container_of. > > Right, notice I said "link it": > > struct vfio_platform_irq *irq = > container_of(prod, struct vfio_platform_irq, producer); > struct vfio_platform_device *vpdev = irq->vpdev; > struct vfio_device *vdev = vpdev->vdev; > > Would this be okay? Yes that's what I did. I added the vfio_device handle in struct vfio_platform_irq Thanks ;-) Have a nice WE Eric > > Paolo > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/