Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2015 09:20:00 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        David Cohen <david.a.cohen@linux.intel.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
        Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>,
        "Stuart R. Anderson" <stuart.r.anderson@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] x86: Allow early_printk to use console style param
 like 115200n8
Message-ID: <20150704092000.322dc4e6@grimm.local.home>
In-Reply-To: <20150704110359.GA18107@gmail.com>
References: <20150703181643.4fd4053d@grimm.local.home>
	<20150704110359.GA18107@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 997
Lines: 32

On Sat, 4 Jul 2015 13:03:59 +0200
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:


> > +		/*
> > +		 * In case the input is like console with text after the baud
> > +		 * rate. e.g. 115200n8. kstrtoul() will error on such input.
> > +		 */
> > +		for (p = s; *p && isdigit(*p); p++)
> > +			;
> > +		*p = 0;
> > +
> >  		if (kstrtoul(s, 0, &baud) < 0 || baud == 0)
> >  			baud = DEFAULT_BAUD;
> 
>

This was actually one of those cases where I wanted to show that
keeping the old function around is better than the alternative ;-)

If people say we need to phase out simple_strtoull(), then I wanted to
show what kinds of hacks we will have if that happens.

I was hoping that someone would point out that simple_strtoull() is a
better solution. :)

-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/