Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 15:33:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 15:33:32 -0500 Received: from itg-gw.cr008.cwt.esat.net ([193.120.242.226]:52998 "EHLO dunlop.admin.ie.alphyra.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 15:33:31 -0500 Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 20:42:50 +0000 (GMT) From: Paul Jakma X-X-Sender: paulj@dunlop.admin.ie.alphyra.com To: Larry McVoy cc: Eli Carter , Linux Kernel Subject: Re: gcc 2.95 vs 3.21 performance In-Reply-To: <20030205002746.GA10206@work.bitmover.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 895 Lines: 23 On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Larry McVoy wrote: > Scripting languages are unacceptable for products. Flat out unacceptable. > I spoke to Chip when he was running the perl effort, his answer was "if > you are worried about new releases of perl breaking your scripts, ship > your own version of perl". There is a perl compiler, perlcc, but its not perfect. why not fund it to have it made perfect. then you get best of all worlds - perl and interpretation at run time for developers and ability to ship binary files to customers. regards, -- Paul Jakma Sys Admin Alphyra paulj@alphyra.ie Warning: /never/ send email to spam@dishone.st or trap@dishone.st - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/