Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 15:59:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 15:59:22 -0500 Received: from franka.aracnet.com ([216.99.193.44]:3252 "EHLO franka.aracnet.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 15:59:21 -0500 Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2003 13:08:50 -0800 From: "Martin J. Bligh" To: niteowl@intrinsity.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.5.59 kernel bugs Message-ID: <267250000.1044565727@[10.10.2.4]> In-Reply-To: <200302062043.h16KhHY05212@bletchley.vert.intrinsity.com> References: <200302062043.h16KhHY05212@bletchley.vert.intrinsity.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.2.1 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1063 Lines: 23 > FWIW, here's a list of potential 2.5.59 kernel bugs. Some of these > might be causing real trouble. Many are probably benign. A few may be > non-bugs that are just poor coding style although I've tried to weed > most of those out of this list. > > The fs/super.c bug is probably the most serious of the bunch as it appears > to completely disable the sync_filesystems() function. Some fairly sickening stuff ... I'll log the following sections in bugzilla If any brave volunteers for the others want to go ahead with the other sections, and split the effort, would be much appreciated. Please mail back to lkml that you're doing it ... and watch very carefully on newly logged bugs for collisions ;-) > ===== dangling else ===== > ===== misplaced/extra semicolon ===== > ===== double logical operator ===== - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/