Message-ID: <559A4012.8070407@ti.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2015 14:15:06 +0530
From: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
CC: <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>, <davem@davemloft.net>,
        <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        <t-kristo@ti.com>, <nsekhar@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] crypto: tcrypt: Added speed tests for Async AEAD
 crypto alogrithms
References: <1435814320-30347-1-git-send-email-lokeshvutla@ti.com> <1435814320-30347-11-git-send-email-lokeshvutla@ti.com> <20150706074403.GE20192@gondor.apana.org.au>
In-Reply-To: <20150706074403.GE20192@gondor.apana.org.au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 834
Lines: 25

Hi,
On Monday 06 July 2015 01:14 PM, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 10:48:40AM +0530, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
>> Adding simple speed tests for a range of block sizes for Async AEAD crypto
>> algorithms.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
> 
> What's wrong with the existing AEAD speed tests?
> 
The existing AEAD test case does not do a wait_for_completion(), when
the return value is EINPROGRESS or EBUSY like it is done for acipher_speed tests.

Can I be updating the same test case for handling this?
Correct me if I am wrong.

Thanks and regards,
Lokesh


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/