Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756408AbbGFNdb (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jul 2015 09:33:31 -0400 Received: from mailout2.w1.samsung.com ([210.118.77.12]:23491 "EHLO mailout2.w1.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756342AbbGFNdW (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jul 2015 09:33:22 -0400 X-AuditID: cbfec7f5-f794b6d000001495-bd-559a839f2e41 From: Pavel Fedin To: "'Christoffer Dall'" , "'Andre Przywara'" Cc: "'Paolo Bonzini'" , "'Eric Auger'" , eric.auger@st.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, "'Marc Zyngier'" , kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1435592237-17924-2-git-send-email-eric.auger@linaro.org> <011f01d0b498$6a17aeb0$3e470c10$@samsung.com> <5596503E.6040902@arm.com> <00fd01d0b7b6$f6cf3550$e46d9ff0$@samsung.com> <559A3C9C.6050302@arm.com> <20150706093026.GA11590@cbox> <559A52E6.5050402@arm.com> <20150706103755.GC11590@cbox> <559A6164.1000401@redhat.com> <559A6527.1040107@arm.com> <20150706120837.GA13530@cbox> In-reply-to: <20150706120837.GA13530@cbox> Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/7] KVM: api: add kvm_irq_routing_extended_msi Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2015 16:33:17 +0300 Message-id: <025301d0b7f0$5210a140$f631e3c0$@samsung.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-index: AQG0/EgbYZUPE6Cyg+K+3J0WmLvmuAHzRWBJAnT+vMgCNpJq4AHBoyuVAXTjtwECJ59AOwIT2QIQAZCigg8A+Ld3gwGZ1zzcnXRHuyA= Content-language: ru X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFprJIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsVy+t/xK7rzm2eFGuy5xmyxYt5PRosXr/8x WszfcobV4urms0wWc6YWWnw8dZzdYtPja6wWl3fNYbP4e+cfm8X+bf9YHbg81sxbw+hx59oe No/zm9Ywe2xeUu/xft9VNo+nP/Yye3zeJBfAHsVlk5Kak1mWWqRvl8CVcf/9eaaCTqaKE8cu MTUwXmTsYuTkkBAwkTi3fC8rhC0mceHeerYuRi4OIYGljBLnWz8xQTjfGSUW9txkB6liE1CX OP31AwuILSKQKPF35RawImaBNiaJrkMzWSA6+pklPs17zAZSxSmgJfHy3HywDmEBZ4lV/w8w g9gsAqoSq563M4HYvAKWEssm32CDsAUlfky+B1bPDNS7fudxJghbXmLzmrfMELcqSOw4+5oR 4ooKiaMP/jJD1IhITPt3j3kCo9AsJKNmIRk1C8moWUhaFjCyrGIUTS1NLihOSs810itOzC0u zUvXS87P3cQIibCvOxiXHrM6xCjAwajEwxtRMzNUiDWxrLgy9xCjBAezkgjvn7JZoUK8KYmV ValF+fFFpTmpxYcYpTlYlMR5Z+56HyIkkJ5YkpqdmlqQWgSTZeLglGpgTCifpLjjusY9S7uE Rl79wvyKJ94P2qu2fUgLZ9jL9fexXuChEkFjC8GtqwPVq/Rzbq16svHcqiUftt2+M1VUk0nQ y/y/v6We5qYttZONjjnWTQs3vD7tzF/lNWr6T4x0FNr+SLzQMnuw4xzD+516L/mWv2bZMoFt d3qd3JQeeydu3bIlhy4mK7EUZyQaajEXFScCAPGNGAOsAgAA Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 499 Lines: 16 > Just so I'm sure I understand: The way the kernel differentiates between > no-devid and devid==0, is whether or not the devid flag is set, correct? Yes, exactly. Kind regards, Pavel Fedin Expert Engineer Samsung Electronics Research center Russia -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/