Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 18:52:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 18:52:19 -0500 Received: from smtpzilla5.xs4all.nl ([194.109.127.141]:58385 "EHLO smtpzilla5.xs4all.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 18:52:17 -0500 Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 01:01:01 +0100 (CET) From: Roman Zippel X-X-Sender: roman@serv To: Greg KH cc: Rusty Russell , Horst von Brand , Kai Germaschewski , , Subject: Re: [PATCH] Restore module support. In-Reply-To: <20030206232515.GA29093@kroah.com> Message-ID: References: <20030204233310.AD6AF2C04E@lists.samba.org> <20030206232515.GA29093@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1101 Lines: 29 Hi, On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, Greg KH wrote: > But what are the modutils numbers? :) There should be no real difference as I'd like to integrate Kai's patch too. > Come on, what Rusty did was the "right thing to do" and has made life > easier for all of the arch maintainers (or so says the ones that I've > talked to), and has made my life easier with regards to > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE() logic, which will enable the /sbin/hotplug > scripts/binary to shrink a _lot_. What was the "right thing to do"? There were certainly a few interesting changes, but I'd like discuss them first. For example there is more than one solution to improve the MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE() logic (*), so how is Rusty's better? bye, Roman (*) http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=104405265719327&w=2 http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=104437966220610&w=2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/