Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 16:39:44 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 16:39:44 -0500 Received: from 213-152-55-49.dsl.eclipse.net.uk ([213.152.55.49]:64417 "EHLO monkey.daikokuya.co.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 16:39:43 -0500 Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 21:49:21 +0000 From: Neil Booth To: b_adlakha@softhome.net Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: gcc 2.95 vs 3.21 performance Message-ID: <20030207214921.GA17153@daikokuya.co.uk> References: <1044385759.1861.46.camel@localhost.localdomain.suse.lists.linux.kernel> <200302041935.h14JZ69G002675@darkstar.example.net.suse.lists.linux.kernel> <3E4045D1.4010704@rogers.com> <20030206070256.GB30345@daikokuya.co.uk> <20030206212218.GA4891@daikokuya.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 724 Lines: 17 b_adlakha@softhome.net wrote:- > Cool (you're trying to fix it), maybe you can modify tcc so it is optimized > for compiling linux (optimized for compiling speed and runtime speed for > linux). I think it'll be easier and quicker to just make it compile linux > properly first, then do the testing/fixing for other things, as they are so > many compilers for other things anyway...And maybe it can be called "Linux > C Compiler"? lol. Sorry, I only care about GCC. Neil. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/