Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933462AbbGGVQZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jul 2015 17:16:25 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:58364 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757992AbbGGVQQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jul 2015 17:16:16 -0400 Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2015 14:16:13 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Eric B Munson Cc: Shuah Khan , Michal Hocko , Michael Kerrisk , Vlastimil Babka , linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 0/5] Allow user to request memory to be locked on page fault Message-Id: <20150707141613.f945c98279dcb71c9743d5f2@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <1436288623-13007-1-git-send-email-emunson@akamai.com> References: <1436288623-13007-1-git-send-email-emunson@akamai.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.4.1 (GTK+ 2.24.23; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1890 Lines: 35 On Tue, 7 Jul 2015 13:03:38 -0400 Eric B Munson wrote: > mlock() allows a user to control page out of program memory, but this > comes at the cost of faulting in the entire mapping when it is > allocated. For large mappings where the entire area is not necessary > this is not ideal. Instead of forcing all locked pages to be present > when they are allocated, this set creates a middle ground. Pages are > marked to be placed on the unevictable LRU (locked) when they are first > used, but they are not faulted in by the mlock call. > > This series introduces a new mlock() system call that takes a flags > argument along with the start address and size. This flags argument > gives the caller the ability to request memory be locked in the > traditional way, or to be locked after the page is faulted in. New > calls are added for munlock() and munlockall() which give the called a > way to specify which flags are supposed to be cleared. A new MCL flag > is added to mirror the lock on fault behavior from mlock() in > mlockall(). Finally, a flag for mmap() is added that allows a user to > specify that the covered are should not be paged out, but only after the > memory has been used the first time. Thanks for sticking with this. Adding new syscalls is a bit of a hassle but I do think we end up with a better interface - the existing mlock/munlock/mlockall interfaces just aren't appropriate for these things. I don't know whether these syscalls should be documented via new manpages, or if we should instead add them to the existing mlock/munlock/mlockall manpages. Michael, could you please advise? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/