From: Sreenath Madasu <sreenath.madasu@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2015 21:08:10 -0400
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Cc: jteki@openedev.com, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Warnings : Fixed 80 character length warning in rtw_ap.c
Message-ID: <20150708010810.GA2563@sreenath-gentoo.lan>
References: <20150707015326.GA3075@sreenath-gentoo.lan>
 <15662.1436297570@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <15662.1436297570@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1177
Lines: 32

The kernelnewbies.org guide said "For your first patch, only pick one
warning". That is the reason why I fixed one warning.

Thanks
Sreenath
On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 03:32:50PM -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
> On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 21:53:26 -0400, Sreenath Madasu said:
> > When the checkpatch.pl script was run, it showed lines with length
> > more than 80 characters in rtw_ap.c file. Fixed line number 382 by
> > breaking it up into two lines within 80 characters.
> 
> 
> > -				stainfo_offset = rtw_stainfo_offset(pstapriv, psta);
> > +				stainfo_offset =
> > +					rtw_stainfo_offset(pstapriv, psta);
> >  				if (stainfo_offset_valid(stainfo_offset))
> >  					chk_alive_list[chk_alive_num++] = stainfo_offset;
> 
> Umm... Sreenath?
> 
> There's 97 more occurrences of the same problem in that file.
> 
> All:  Is it time to kill that checkpatch test, or hide it behind a non-default
> flag, to prevent code churn?
> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/