Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932582AbbGHHCz (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jul 2015 03:02:55 -0400 Received: from arroyo.ext.ti.com ([192.94.94.40]:47173 "EHLO arroyo.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754091AbbGHHCn (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jul 2015 03:02:43 -0400 Message-ID: <559CCA63.4080609@ti.com> Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 12:29:47 +0530 From: Lokesh Vutla User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Herbert Xu CC: , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] crypto: omap-aes: Add support for GCM mode References: <1436283109-13318-1-git-send-email-lokeshvutla@ti.com> <1436283109-13318-7-git-send-email-lokeshvutla@ti.com> <20150708041838.GA12744@gondor.apana.org.au> In-Reply-To: <20150708041838.GA12744@gondor.apana.org.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3720 Lines: 112 On Wednesday 08 July 2015 09:48 AM, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 09:01:48PM +0530, Lokesh Vutla wrote: >> >> +static int omap_aes_gcm_copy_buffers(struct omap_aes_dev *dd, >> + struct aead_request *req) >> +{ >> + void *buf_in; >> + int pages, alen, clen, cryptlen, nsg; >> + struct crypto_aead *aead = crypto_aead_reqtfm(req); >> + unsigned int authlen = crypto_aead_authsize(aead); >> + u32 dec = !(dd->flags & FLAGS_ENCRYPT); >> + struct scatterlist *input, *assoc, tmp[2]; >> + >> + alen = ALIGN(req->assoclen, AES_BLOCK_SIZE); >> + cryptlen = req->cryptlen - (dec * authlen); >> + clen = ALIGN(cryptlen, AES_BLOCK_SIZE); >> + >> + dd->sgs_copied = 0; >> + >> + nsg = !!(req->assoclen && req->cryptlen); >> + >> + assoc = &req->src[0]; >> + sg_init_table(dd->in_sgl, nsg + 1); >> + if (req->assoclen) { >> + if (omap_aes_check_aligned(assoc, req->assoclen)) { >> + dd->sgs_copied |= AES_ASSOC_DATA_COPIED; >> + pages = get_order(alen); >> + buf_in = (void *)__get_free_pages(GFP_ATOMIC, pages); >> + if (!buf_in) { >> + pr_err("Couldn't allocate for unaligncases.\n"); >> + return -1; >> + } >> + >> + scatterwalk_map_and_copy(buf_in, assoc, 0, >> + req->assoclen, 0); >> + memset(buf_in + req->assoclen, 0, alen - req->assoclen); >> + } else { >> + buf_in = sg_virt(req->assoc); > > req->assoc is now obsolete. Did you test this code? Sorry, I missed it. Ill update. > >> +static int do_encrypt_iv(struct aead_request *req, u32 *tag) >> +{ >> + struct scatterlist iv_sg; >> + struct ablkcipher_request *ablk_req; >> + struct crypto_ablkcipher *tfm; >> + struct tcrypt_result result; >> + struct omap_aes_ctx *ctx = crypto_aead_ctx(crypto_aead_reqtfm(req)); >> + int ret = 0; >> + >> + tfm = crypto_alloc_ablkcipher("ctr(aes)", 0, 0); > > Ugh, you cannot allocate crypto transforms in the data path. You > should allocate it in init instead. Also using ctr(aes) is overkill. > Just use aes and do the xor by hand. Ill take care of this. > >> +static int omap_aes_gcm_crypt(struct aead_request *req, unsigned long mode) >> +{ >> + struct omap_aes_ctx *ctx = crypto_aead_ctx(crypto_aead_reqtfm(req)); >> + struct omap_aes_reqctx *rctx = aead_request_ctx(req); >> + struct crypto_aead *aead = crypto_aead_reqtfm(req); >> + unsigned int authlen = crypto_aead_authsize(aead); >> + struct omap_aes_dev *dd; >> + __be32 counter = cpu_to_be32(1); >> + int err; >> + >> + memset(ctx->auth_tag, 0, sizeof(ctx->auth_tag)); > > The ctx is shared memory and you must not write to it as multiple > requests can be called on the same tfm. Use rctx instead. > >> + memcpy(req->iv + 12, &counter, 4); > > The IV is only 12 bytes long so you're corrupting memory here. > You should use rctx here too. Ok, Ill use rctx. Thanks for pointing. > >> + if (req->assoclen + req->cryptlen == 0) { >> + scatterwalk_map_and_copy(ctx->auth_tag, req->dst, 0, authlen, >> + 1); >> + return 0; >> + } > > How can this be right? Did you enable the selftest? Why not? Self tests are passed for this case. As per the equation given in GCM spec[1], we can see that if assoclen and cryptlen is 0, then output of GCM is just E(K, Y0) where Y0 = IV||(0^31)1 I have E(K, Y0) calculated in previous step. And copying it to destination if assoclen and cryptlen is 0. Correct me if I am wrong. Thanks and regards, Lokesh [1] http://csrc.nist.gov/groups/ST/toolkit/BCM/documents/proposedmodes/gcm/gcm-revised-spec.pdf > > Cheers, > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/