Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932474AbbGHHJs (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jul 2015 03:09:48 -0400 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.17.11]:63896 "EHLO mout.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754091AbbGHHJf (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jul 2015 03:09:35 -0400 Subject: Re: Clarification for the use of additional fields in the message body To: Julian Calaby References: <530CD2C4.4050903@users.sourceforge.net> <530CF8FF.8080600@users.sourceforge.net> <530DD06F.4090703@users.sourceforge.net> <5317A59D.4@users.sourceforge.net> <558EB32E.6090003@users.sourceforge.net> <558EB4DE.3080406@users.sourceforge.net> <20150707023103.GA22043@kroah.com> <559B6FF8.9010704@users.sourceforge.net> <559B85CD.6040200@users.sourceforge.net> <559BBDD6.7040808@users.sourceforge.net> <559BFB19.2080700@users.sourceforge.net> Cc: Frans Klaver , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Chris Park , Dean Lee , Johnny Kim , Rachel Kim , linux-wireless , "devel@driverdev.osuosl.org" , Julia Lawall , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, LKML From: SF Markus Elfring X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <559CCC9D.8050606@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 09:09:17 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:b3pjgTMQFw+uhGoiBB5rHfufbOD97mKMnQRW4ld1doesnnRjNGR W/kxxUds7in5RiKWF7OorH4pHTWbtiCnO2gHsXWZCW0SoMGQvlbC7J036XPIjuD9a+MPg3x JZs/CFWzA7AWNApG/hQ+sTBfWwF/2gfBg/ruLNPMp7+8sgD0Zs701vIKoywDGsN/pWTj/vF 8RYwXJLcfHhH04TGA3WZg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:mQkAKF6vS1o=:+yt2z79az3cLEoIy2ogpPX G9PQ6HEg++fhnYHFStasK6tdcz2w0CpJak1q+bJ8hEnSjLKNToqmOnVfp1npmHXzSwRZ4SEcj DHDEC3pGngg++zjWxkVz6zUekdCjCZqBz+8CVuDTZI7/cm9PUNK8M50MfwpfYSUnknbkQranA Z9VET+6Bb2TdfM1WJ7+j2pTOSv6EfFhMK2MbbaD/Jftw/s8DSqia4c3vybCkTTxF2ox0nvI6J ySSOr59zzKyARVKJW2vlKXmkV6HYBSq+rH3DhbtZPwMjWCfbeXx5JMaqf0VLvr4oFWb3P0iZE xVsJa8qPdZTG5alb2FT5A42HMrTTGTbnszm+M73Gpohcv6gzUCUHo5e238bI3sKXhx798uyc6 hpAwCmFI9mE9e2y7b5QcGQY2yBjU4lHcApKwnaRHLRg5jUGOfrUnKVFkxTwNPtUpfxorbdS00 oBbipCY6JfST3KXfMJ5hIDzYSdd4se2sCtklKp9HJiBiSVagiSzRnIHdHiiLUL1iuBFazTMP2 ukGztCkcB0XKo/B0JsvFAA1Zv75u+MwqVOrWhhVbWBE/AtMmakmUnWFhFUPnwgywM5DT6odG6 i9VRQRm5WVI5OgakDLLoo2mJ8VREUDjMYj5H4CTNMoVvcSOVIWb3tTFe83Zlftvz2jUiLhd0n 9wI3kosSDvjOdWeE9/rwNCRBb/odrtmQFxMCC4WvE26UOFceC5DM/xFIRcrcNRmHKFNY= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1204 Lines: 39 > There's a file in the documentation directory of the kernel > tree describing submitting patches and email client setup. > Read them both, I read this information several times. > do what they say without anything extra. Do you see any special consequences if a bit of "extra" functionality is already provided by the Git software for a while? > Your attempts to "improve" on the system are unnecessary It seems that my approach does not need improvements for the current command "git am". Would a few extensions for the available documentation help to clarify the situation? Do items like "commit mail address" and "commit timestamp" belong together for the data structure "author" by design in this content management system? > and annoying people. I understand that various update suggestions can be surprising. It is also usual that corresponding acceptance might take a bit longer than what some contributors would prefer. Regards, Markus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/