Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758639AbbGHMwT (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jul 2015 08:52:19 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-f42.google.com ([74.125.82.42]:35449 "EHLO mail-wg0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758578AbbGHMwO (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jul 2015 08:52:14 -0400 Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 14:52:10 +0200 From: Frederic Weisbecker To: Oleg Nesterov Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, cl@linux.com, riel@redhat.com, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, tj@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: + kmod-remove-unecessary-explicit-wide-cpu-affinity-setting.patch added to -mm tree Message-ID: <20150708125209.GA9181@lerouge> References: <559c5c37.S4vYB5A6NQhb8Yx5%akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20150707233226.GA3611@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150707233226.GA3611@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1625 Lines: 44 On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 01:32:26AM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > Well, sorry for noise. > > Let me repeat that I agree with this change, but... > > On 07/07, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > From: Frederic Weisbecker > > Subject: kmod: remove unecessary explicit wide CPU affinity setting > > > > Not only useless it even breaks nohz full. The housekeeping work (general > > kernel internal code that user doesn't care much about) is handled by a > > reduced set of CPUs in nohz full, precisely those that are not included by > > nohz_full= kernel parameters. For example unbound workqueues are handled > > by housekeeping CPUs. > > I still think this part of the changelog looks confusing and just wrong. I agree! > > It is not that it breaks nohz full, unbound workqueues have nothing to > do with housekeeping_mask from the kernel pov. But yes, people can change > ->cpumask and this can connect to housekeeping_mask. Right. In fact that's the motivation of the patch but the connection is much more indirect than what the changelog suggests. So I'll fix the changelog. > > Frederic, may I ask you to update the changelog? Although perhaps it was > just me who was confused... Sure! I think Andrew applied the patches to keep track of them and make sure they don't get lost. But I'm working on a new iteration to replace them. Thanks! > Oleg. > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/