Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758635AbbGHP16 (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jul 2015 11:27:58 -0400 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.17.11]:57849 "EHLO mout.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755863AbbGHP1z (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jul 2015 11:27:55 -0400 Subject: Re: Clarification for the use of additional fields in the message body To: "Theodore Ts'o" , Julian Calaby , Frans Klaver , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Chris Park , Dean Lee , Johnny Kim , Rachel Kim , linux-wireless , "devel@driverdev.osuosl.org" , Julia Lawall , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, LKML References: <559B85CD.6040200@users.sourceforge.net> <559BBDD6.7040808@users.sourceforge.net> <559BFB19.2080700@users.sourceforge.net> <559CCC9D.8050606@users.sourceforge.net> <559CED4C.1080402@users.sourceforge.net> <20150708150335.GB20551@thunk.org> From: SF Markus Elfring X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <559D416A.7050601@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 17:27:38 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20150708150335.GB20551@thunk.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:yiL0YIFbloZey9TAjzchP4KR7h4CnsUVyXlDNvwnXGSsNetE/DF u4nliigk2+zF3wGMBOzeAXF5PlJVxPET7GW38+iBunCZA79HEnCgHCydBspWY2Pfem9Kvcr YnLHEMV8QTPUDnUI0GrxfYJTDY8qqkOmYrMa/KNC2l7gy2W9XbR+UF2pDc4eFdsh6h3FBRs D9LV0d9pcGu8MGPymqmag== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:DIzTKV/pVSo=:ItGnKGa7OrQx+a/8NbH3KG 2QGj+r5N11M+cyUO5iLf9mg9wBS4DfVr0kYEpR1MUVPmalKK4Y+4RkCtKRDRG0y786zBb/fg6 ShuOrK5c1AGnvUm8+KX6RfsbuoHOL18oZoOlhvCbNKPa1knexm2XWStdmISj2SZnoDYjwn25f PUJHKDZWX7I2FXQxMF6gv5p7i0KimzKcjbrea5N6l3yk6f0btX/OxTsp8Hlab2KYmYaynAqpq 6ajKl7dsFRIqqWW94Q1AaxDRd0DkiAWW1rpnaDPrTIHPWn6Fthjb1hgzdi8uaIe+Iwop3u8yl DTJOJQGFd0Mv7Ks61A5ZNSyNcdiQpuFpIpNZ24DrXgo9HoBAd28LDQGpPGPDYJ1OmcVtJxEoj tPYj5otQOq5KeGr0Ndgurb+n9KN51NRoknOFerUPufU5JcHqlab0w0jkuKWQItbNkG1fHU++o CkBN00l3urG6EVbsH0wFiqTl/ccHGBYl9pQNHkmFbvebgdEnzZOesDnCz7SsnLW1pvNIr1Fnu Bcb+abqTCGoZfa8Ot8mWJ8Kljzh/Puo5+Mr8QAPJeXvGxGX15gyxfQzZ9uLyEWww0GuLBddr9 aFHK5d3PE1hGsvyK1zEIWLv9NNxL5uYIDeVZKbIg0F199/JhfDylpPgZO6euEG2AE6fLsgsE1 rg1KGXADt3RMs5zGR2wVBqMUDDCW7ffxoUqYAeNxB90E858KCgs8CSFvOrn76SvnifF8= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 729 Lines: 19 > Note also that some maintainers have work flow that deliberately smash > the date (i.e., because they are using a system such as guilt), > so if you are depending on the submitted timestamp, it's going to > break on you. Thanks for your hint. I am just trying to offer the possibility for the reuse of a more precise commit timestamp together with an appropriate author mail address for my update suggestions. Do you reject any more such message field overrides? Regards, Markus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/