Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752850AbbGHX6a (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jul 2015 19:58:30 -0400 Received: from mail-ig0-f176.google.com ([209.85.213.176]:36226 "EHLO mail-ig0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751644AbbGHX62 (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jul 2015 19:58:28 -0400 Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 16:58:26 -0700 (PDT) From: David Rientjes X-X-Sender: rientjes@chino.kir.corp.google.com To: Sasha Levin cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kirill@shutemov.name Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/11] mm: debug: dump page into a string rather than directly on screen In-Reply-To: <55946EA9.2080805@oracle.com> Message-ID: References: <1431623414-1905-1-git-send-email-sasha.levin@oracle.com> <1431623414-1905-6-git-send-email-sasha.levin@oracle.com> <55943DC1.6010209@oracle.com> <55946EA9.2080805@oracle.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.10 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1429 Lines: 40 On Wed, 1 Jul 2015, Sasha Levin wrote: > Since we'd BUG at VM_BUG_ON(), this would be something closer to: > > if (unlikely(compound_head(page) != head)) { > dump_page(page); > dump_page(head); > VM_BUG_ON(1); > } > I was thinking closer to if (VM_WARN_ON(compound_head(page) != head)) { ... BUG(); } so we prefix all output with the typical warning diagnostics, emit whatever page, vma, etc output we want, and then finally die. The final BUG() here would have to be replaced by something that suppresses the repeated output. If it's really just a warning, then no BUG() needed. > But my point here was that while one *could* do it that way, no one does because > it's not intuitive. We both agree that in the example above it would be useful to > see both 'page' and 'head', and yet the code that was written didn't dump any of > them. Why? No one wants to write debug code unless it's easy and short. > pr_alert("%pZp %pZv", page, vma) isn't shorter than dump_page(page); dump_vma(vma), but it would be a line shorter. I'm not sure that the former is easier, though, and it prevents us from ever expanding dump_*() functions for conditional output. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/