Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 11:30:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 11:30:08 -0500 Received: from t2.redhat.com ([199.183.24.243]:50931 "EHLO passion.cambridge.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 11:29:54 -0500 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.2 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 From: David Woodhouse X-Accept-Language: en_GB In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: To: "Mark Haney" Cc: "James Sutherland" , "Rik van Riel" , "Alan Olsen" , "David D.W. Downey" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux stifles innovation... Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 16:26:28 +0000 Message-ID: <19733.982340788@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org mhaney@info4cars.com said: > Okay, so if we are going to get real stupid about the whole thing, I > wonder if Microsloth is going to patent the patent? Filing nuisance patents for obvious stuff which shouldn't ever get granted is a viable business method and as such is patentable in the US. After all, what patent officer is going to point out the prior art? :) -- dwmw2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/