Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753041AbbGIGat (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jul 2015 02:30:49 -0400 Received: from down.free-electrons.com ([37.187.137.238]:48551 "EHLO mail.free-electrons.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751237AbbGIGan (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jul 2015 02:30:43 -0400 Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2015 08:30:41 +0200 From: Boris Brezillon To: Lee Jones Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, broonie@kernel.org, kernel@stlinux.com, lgirdwood@gmail.com, Doug Anderson Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] regulator: pwm-regulator: Introduce continuous-mode Message-ID: <20150709083041.3b203eb1@bbrezillon> In-Reply-To: <1436281613-899-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> References: <1436281613-899-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.23; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2423 Lines: 62 Hi Lee, I'm interested in this feature (so as Doug is), could you add us in Cc of your next submission ? On Tue, 7 Jul 2015 16:06:44 +0100 Lee Jones wrote: > This patch-set has been rebased on to topic/pwm. > > Continuous mode uses the PWM regulator's maximum and minimum supplied > voltages specified in the regulator-{min,max}-microvolt properties to > calculate appropriate duty-cycle values. This allows for a much more > fine grained solution when compared with voltage-table mode, which > this driver already supports. This solution does make an assumption > that a %50 duty-cycle value will cause the regulator voltage to run > at half way between the supplied max_uV and min_uV values. Well, I'm not sure this assumption works for all pwm driven regulators. What if your regulator does not react linearly to the PWM duty-cycle config ? How about addressing that by using all the entries of the voltage<->duty table association and doing the linear interpolation between the provided points instead of doing it on the min -> max range ? Best Regards, Boris > > Lee Jones (9): > ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Enable ST's PWM driver > ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Enable ST's Power Reset driver > ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Enable support for PWM Regulators > ARM: STi: STiH407: Move PWM nodes STiH407 => STiH407-family > ARM: STi: STiH407: Add PWM Regulator node > regulator: pwm-regulator: Re-write bindings > regulator: pwm-regulator: Add support for continuous-voltage > regulator: pwm-regulator: Simplify voltage to duty-cycle call > regulator: pwm-regulator: Don't assign structure attributes right away > > .../bindings/regulator/pwm-regulator.txt | 68 ++++++++++--- > arch/arm/boot/dts/stih407-family.dtsi | 41 ++++++++ > arch/arm/boot/dts/stih407.dtsi | 28 ------ > arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig | 3 + > drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c | 109 ++++++++++++++++++--- > 5 files changed, 198 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-) > -- Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/