Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 9 Feb 2003 07:56:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 9 Feb 2003 07:56:29 -0500 Received: from [81.2.122.30] ([81.2.122.30]:64004 "EHLO darkstar.example.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 9 Feb 2003 07:56:28 -0500 From: John Bradford Message-Id: <200302091307.h19D76wV000674@darkstar.example.net> Subject: Re: Some Doubts About bootsect.S & Setup.S To: borasah@netone.com.tr (=?iso-8859-9?B?Qm9yYSDeYWhpbg==?=) Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2003 13:07:06 +0000 (GMT) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <010f01c2d038$0dbe0c60$0100a8c0@bora> from "=?iso-8859-9?B?Qm9yYSDeYWhpbg==?=" at Feb 09, 2003 02:23:02 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 977 Lines: 27 > 1) > sread: .word 0 # sectors read of current track > head: .word 0 # current head > track: .word 0 # current track > > Since a diskette can have at most 2 heads, 80 tracks and 36 sectors per > track, why are these not bytes instead of words especially since space is at > such a tight premium in this code? See: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=104250711526623&w=2 > Someone(H. Peter Anvin) tell me that these codes was old and broken, and was > getting nuked in 2.5. The in-kernel bootloader will almost certainly not be in 2.6. Personally, I think it would be good to replace it with some kind of monitor, but I don't think anybody else would agree with me :-) John. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/