Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2015 19:11:28 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Jason Baron <jasonbaron0@gmail.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
        Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
        Vince Weaver <vince@deater.net>, "hillf.zj" <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com>,
        Valdis Kletnieks <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Kernel broken on processors without performance counters
Message-ID: <20150709171127.GB19282@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1507081000540.5217@file01.intranet.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com>
 <20150708160750.GQ19282@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <CALCETrVqeG=3sKJv=pe9ZfaeRmx9uz+jNmXGmPu-7Hah4NvYDQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <559D8250.8000707@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <559D8250.8000707@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 714
Lines: 16

On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 04:04:32PM -0400, Jason Baron wrote:
> So the 'static_key_false' is really branch is initially false. We had
> a naming discussion before, but if ppl think its confusing,
> 'static_key_init_false', or 'static_key_default_false' might be better,
> or other ideas.... I agree its confusing.

Jason, while I have you here on the subject; mind posting that true/fase
thing again? That makes more sense than the inc/dec thing for some usage
sites.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/