Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 17:36:33 +0530
From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Ananth Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
        Anton Arapov <arapov@gmail.com>, David Long <dave.long@linaro.org>,
        Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>,
        "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Jan Willeke <willeke@de.ibm.com>, Jim Keniston <jkenisto@us.ibm.com>,
        Mark Wielaard <mjw@redhat.com>, Pratyush Anand <panand@redhat.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/11] uprobes: Add the "enum rp_check ctx" arg to
 arch_uretprobe_is_alive()
Message-ID: <20150710120633.GJ26095@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reply-To: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
References: <20150707012210.GA7466@redhat.com>
 <20150707012310.GA7550@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20150707012310.GA7550@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 717
Lines: 21

* Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> [2015-07-07 03:23:10]:

> arch/x86 doesn't care (so far), but as Pratyush Anand pointed out
> other architectures might want why arch_uretprobe_is_alive() was
> called and use different checks depending on the context. Add the
> new argument to distinguish 2 callers.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>

Looks good to me.

Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-- 
Thanks and Regards
Srikar Dronamraju

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/